David Versus Godzilla: Bigger Stones

Photo of Jerry Ellig and Richard Williams

By: Jerry Ellig & Richard Williams

September 12, 2019


Download this Working Paper (PDF)

ABSTRACT                                                      

For nearly four decades, U.S. presidents have issued executive orders requiring agencies to conduct comprehensive regulatory impact analysis (RIA) for significant regulations to ensure that regulatory decisions solve social problems in a cost-beneficial manner. Yet experience demonstrates that agency RIAs often fail to live up to the standards enunciated in executive orders and Office of Management and Budget guidance. We suggest four managerial changes that could increase OIRA’s leverage:  (1) Define what counts as success when a regulation is adopted and link this to the agency’s strategic goals, (2) Use budget recommendations to enforce analytical requirements and achievement of agency GPRA objectives, (3)  Combine regulatory budgets with agency budgets, and (4) Reward results, not activity.

Continue reading (PDF)

 

This working paper is part of a series hosted by the George Mason University Center for the Study of the Administrative State. Two additional papers submitted by Regulatory Studies Center scholars are also available:

OIRA Past & Future - by Susan E. Dudley

Codifying the Cost-Benefit State - by Brian F. Mannix & Bridget C.E. Dooling