A Vast and Discretionary Regime
Federal agencies have significant discretion to remove or alter regulatory barriers to methadone treatment.
Academic books and long-term research projects published by Center scholars that advance the overall knowledge of various aspects of regulatory processes and policies.
By: Bridget C.E. Dooling and Laura Stanley
By: Bridget C.E. Dooling, Daniel R. Pérez and Steven J. Balla
Scholars at the GW Regulatory Studies Center have frequently served as consultants to ACUS, producing the following reports.
The GW Regulatory Studies Center's cooperative agreement with the US Department of Agriculture to analyze agricultural regulations.
By: the GW Regulatory Studies Center and the Weidenbaum Center at Washington University in St. Louis.
Essay by: Christopher Carrigan
By: Susan E. Dudley and Jerry Brito
Edited by: Cary Coglianese, Adam M. Finkel, and Christopher Carrigan
By: Steven J. Balla & William T. Gormley, Jr.
Since 2018, Regulatory Studies Center scholars have co-authored the Rulemaking chapter of "Developments in Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice," an annual publication of the American Bar Association.
By D. Pérez, S. Dudley, N. Eisner, R. Lutter, D. Zorn, N. Nord, and K. Wegrich
Chapter by Sofie E. Miller and Brian Mannix
A Vast and Discretionary Regime
Federal agencies have significant discretion to remove or alter regulatory barriers to methadone treatment.
Methadone Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder
This report on the proceedings of a National Academies of Sciences workshop features research and commentary from Bridget Dooling and Laura Stanley.
Back to the Future: How Not to Write a Regulation
The new activists at the FTC are again seeking radical transformation of long-standing legal foundations of antitrust and consumer protection, to be implemented through a new wave of rulemaking.