The Government Shutdown's Effect on Regulatory Output

Photo of Daniel Pérez
By: Daniel R. Pérez
February 06, 2019

Last week, previously furloughed federal employees returned to work after a record-breaking government shutdown of 35 days which began on December 22, 2018. A month ago, RSC Professor Bridget Dooling predicted that the shutdown would substantially reduce regulatory activity since both the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) and the Office of the Federal Register (OFR) were unfunded. This commentary presents data that show those predictions were valid.

Stalled Oversight at OIRA

Executive Order 12866 requires “significant” regulations to be reviewed by OIRA before regulatory agencies can issue them. However, given its lapse in funding, OIRA limited its oversight during the shutdown to rules classified as “excepted activities” (e.g., rules deemed necessary to “protect life and property” such as those related to national security, emergency and disaster assistance, etc.).

Up until the shutdown, OIRA conducted approximately 28 reviews per month, on average throughout 2018;[1] OIRA completed just 7 reviews during the shutdown compared to 18 reviews conducted during the same timeframe last year.

Chart of OIRA Review CountsDecline in Publications in the Federal Register

In order to invite public comment or complete the rulemaking process, agencies must publish their rules in the Federal Register. But OFR was also caught up in the shutdown; it initially announced that it would only publish documents that agencies certified as “necessary to safeguard human life, protect property, or provide other emergency services.” It lowered its standard part-way through the shutdown such that funded agencies would only have to certify that delaying publication until the end of the appropriations lapse “would prevent or significantly damage the execution of funded functions at the agency.” 

From November 1st to December 21st, OFR published an average of 329 pages per day; during the shutdown, it published an average of 114 per day—approximately a 65 percent decrease. During the Obama administration shutdown in 2013, the Federal Register published 45 percent fewer pages per day.

The Federal Register also publishes other items that are not necessarily related to regulation (e.g., notices, presidential documents); observing changes in the number of published proposed and final rules provides a more precise illustration of the shutdown’s effect on regulatory output. From November 1 until the shutdown, the Federal Register printed an average of 22 rules per day. During the shutdown, OFR published slightly less than 8 rules daily. This amounts to a 64 percent reduction in rules published during the shutdown. OFR published 408 proposed and final rules during the same period last year (compared to a total of 166 during this shutdown).

Interestingly, despite the end of the shutdown on January 25, the regulatory pace has not yet returned to prior levels. Some significant regulations signed before or during the shutdown have still not been published. This stall in regulatory output has substantial implications for President Trump’s deregulatory agenda. Since regulations take months to years to move through the notice-and-comment process, the administration may be running short on time to get through the items on the president’s agenda.

Chart of Pages Published

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Chart of Rules Published

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daniel R. Pérez is a senior policy analyst at The George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center.

Download this Commentary (PDF)


[1]   Data obtained from Reginfo.gov by searching concluded regulatory reviews including the following regulatory actions: prerules, proposed rules, and all final and interim final rules.