Salience, complexity and state resistance to federal mandates

JPP
by Steven J. Balla, Scholar, & Christopher J. Deering, Professor of Political Science
October 28, 2015

Download the article

Abstract

Although state resistance to federal mandates is a prevalent characteristic of contemporary American federalism, little is known about the factors that separate resisting states from states that do not oppose federal policy. This article examines state resistance through a framework that classifies public policies by salience and complexity and identifies societal interests and government officials who are hypothesised to influence policy making on issues of varying types. These hypotheses are investigated in the context of state resistance to four federal laws – the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, No Child Left Behind Act, Help America Vote Act and REAL ID Act. The results of the statistical analysis demonstrate the centrality of the characteristics of citizens, elected officials and specialised interest groups in conditioning state resistance to federal mandates. These results suggest that state resistance can be characterised as a strategic response to federal mandates that varies systematically across types of public policies.

Read the full article in the Journal of Public Policy, Volume 35, Issue 3, December 2015.

Citation:  Steven J. Balla and Christopher J. Deering (2015). Salience, complexity and state resistance to federal mandates. Journal of Public Policy, 35, pp 459-476. doi:10.1017/S0143814X1500001X.