AI Regulation and Federalism: What the Moratorium (That Wasn’t) Debate Revealed
Adopting a state-level moratorium against policies regulating artificial intelligence would help ensure consistency and prevent legal fragmentation
The GW Regulatory Studies Center scholars regularly conduct applied research to understand regulatory policy and practice from a public interest perspective. Our content often takes the form of public interest comments, formal testimony, working papers, policy insights, and short commentaries analyzing the most pressing issues in regulatory policy. View the rest of our material by the different types of publications listed on this page or our research areas.
Long-form publications intended for academic audiences that take a deep dive into a particular aspect of regulatory policy.
Scholarly analysis of the potential effects of particular rulemakings from federal agencies, and advice to Congress on how to improve the rulemaking process.
Short-form publications intended for all audiences which provide easy to access analysis of regulatory policy.
Formal publications, often completed with other leading organizations and individuals, providing a thorough understanding of regulations and the rulemaking process.
The weekly Regulation Digest contains everything you need to know about regulatory policy today, and our monthly Center Update gives you all of the latest from our team.
For accessible charts and supporting data that you can use in your own publications or presentations, visit the Reg Stats page.
AI Regulation and Federalism: What the Moratorium (That Wasn’t) Debate Revealed
Adopting a state-level moratorium against policies regulating artificial intelligence would help ensure consistency and prevent legal fragmentation
Trump's Spring 2025 Unified Agenda
Rulemaking highlights from the first Unified Agenda of the second Trump administration.
A CFTC Commissioner’s and Legal Scholar’s Perspectives on AI and Regulatory Accountability
Virtual remarks by CFTC Commissioner Kristin Johnson and in-person remarks by Ohio State Law professor Bridget C.E. Dooling
Public comment in support of FTC data collection for furthering the Commission's consumer protection and competition missions.
Supporting Freight in Transportation Reauthorization
Policy commentary in support of freight provisions in transportation reauthorization to strengthen infrastructure, investment, and supply chains
Congress Reviewed: The 119th Congress's Use of the Congressional Review Act
Comparing use of the Congressional Review Act from one lookback window to the last, especially outcomes, trends, and procedural developments.
Can AI Streamline Regulation and Reduce Compliance Burdens: Event Themes
Summary of main themes from the July 2025 conference co-hosted by the Regulatory Studies Center and Norm Ai
Regulatory Functions Most Amenable to AI-Driven Process Improvement
Summary of a panel discussion at July 2025 conference co-hosted by RSC and Norm Ai
AI Regulation: Perspectives from the Business Community
Experts from the legal community discuss how AI is transforming business and the regulatory challenges that come with it
Considerations for Artificial Intelligence in Government
Speakers discussed challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence to streamline regulatory compliance burdens and improve government outcomes