Commentaries & Insights

Our Commentaries and Insights are short-form publications intended to distill long-form research and synthesize current policymaking activity into easily understood concepts.


One (un)remarkable problem?

The public policy world is not exempt misunderstandings, and the renewed emphasis on retrospective regulatory review is a case in point.

Political Discourse Includes Regulatory Reform

This commentary provides a brief review of what the 2016 presidential candidates have to say about regulatory reform.

Early Notice from U.S. Agencies Could Help Avoid Creating Barriers to Trade

Early Notice from U.S. Agencies Could Help Avoid Creating Barriers to Trade

Evaluating Retrospective Review of Regulations in 2014

President Obama has encouraged agencies to review existing regulations and to modify, streamline, expand, or repeal them.

The Ozone Charade

New EPA standard seems driven by economic tradeoffs, despite agency's assertion

OMB Reports Higher Costs and Lower Benefits in 2015 Draft Report

The Office Management and Budget (OMB) released its annual Draft Report to Congress on the Benefits and Costs of Federal Regulations (“the Report”), which provides a window into regulatory activity conducted by federal agencies in Fiscal Year 2014. The Report indicates that the new regulations issued last fiscal year have both higher costs and lower benefits than those issued in FY 2013, and that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) remains by far the largest contributor to both regulatory costs and benefits in this Report.

The Tension between Optimization and Competition in Rulemaking: The Case of Proposed Fuel-Efficiency Standards for Trucks

Executive Order No. 12866, signed by President Clinton, directs agencies to analyze the benefits and costs of regulations, and to try to maximize the excess of the former over the latter.  It is a sound principle, but it needs to be applied with an appropriate measure of humility. 

EPA’s Ozone Rule and the Scientization of Policy

EPA standards on Clean Air Act reflect hidden policy choices